FS GLOBAL REAL WEATHER VS OPUS SIMULATOR

Stratus, on the other hand, is a вЂњhorizontalвЂќ cloud, much more stable and without much vertical air movement within it, usually covering a larger area and associated with continuous periods of rain, stable but cool temperatures and dull, dreary days. Again, oversimplifying things, cumulus can be thought of as a вЂњverticalвЂќ cloud, within which air rises and falls, creating a the fluffy, lumpy, cloud with which we are familiar on a warm summerвЂ™s day, or on a day when scattered rain showers are predicted. There are two basic types of cloud, at their most simple Cumulus and Stratus. Now letвЂ™s add in another limitation of desktop flight sim weather depiction вЂ“ cloud types. Supercomputers have problems working out what the weather is doing/going to do in the real world, so asking a laptop or average desktop to do the same calculations while spending most of its time drawing graphics and calculating flight models just isnвЂ™t going to happen. You can mitigate against all of the drawbacks of either mode, to differing extents, but neither is ever going to perfect in a desktop sim. The advantage of this is that you can see whether around you changing, but at the cost of frequent and often severe changes of wind direction, speed, air pressure and cloud cover. вЂњStationвЂќ mode allocates weather depending on the weather at a specific nearby weather station, hence the name. This isnвЂ™t possible when the weather is set to a вЂglobalвЂ™ mode. Anyone who has flown in the real world will tell you that you can see differences most of the time вЂ“ clear patches, the cloud вЂwallвЂ™ that delineates an approaching front, localised showers that can be seen well in advance and avoided. when flying online in multiplayer), but the downside is that the weather is the same вЂwall to wallвЂ™. This means you get predictable weather, which is great when identical weather conditions are required for an area (e.g. In вЂњglobalвЂќ mode, whatever the weather is doing at your closest station, those settings are applied to the entire world. To oversimplify things a little, there are two ways of handling FS weather вЂњglobalвЂќ and вЂњstationвЂќ. The reasons for the development of FSGRW are primarily because of the way that most FS weather applications handle the weather.

This time IвЂ™m going to start by discussing why FSGRW was developed at all, because thatвЂ™s going to be the crux of the review and what will set you down the path of deciding whether it is for you or not. Normally speaking, reviews start with a section discussing the installation of the package, how much space it takes up on your hard drive, its documenation and things like that. The company is best known for the FS Global area scenery packages, but with the release of FS Global Real Weather (FSGRW) they have taken on the incumbents on their home turf and are gaining a very definite foothold, so why is that? What does FSGRW bring to the table? Well, obviously thatвЂ™s the job of this article to examine, so letвЂ™s get straight on with it.

That last statement doesnвЂ™t apply to PilotвЂ™s, however. Pretty much every one promises the most вЂrealisticвЂ™ weather possible in the sim and most people, certainly most developers, seem to consider it a closed market dominated by one or two major players.

FS GLOBAL REAL WEATHER VS OPUS SIMULATOR

There are, and have been for a while, a large number of weather generation and injection packages available for MicrosoftвЂ™s flight simulator series.

Fs global real weather vs opus